Nerdfighters

I don't usually follow celebrity gossip, but I found this article pretty disturbing:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/19/fashion/19brown.html

Mr. Brown abused his girlfriend, and his fangirls still support him??

Views: 56

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

There are some things which are called slapping which are really light and not harmful that happen all the time.  It is possible that she didn't hit him hard enough for it to be considered assault because he wasn't injured.

She didn't hit him at all.  The link to the police report is below.

fan girls are really dumb.
A little while ago I posted a discussion called "What the Eff do non-nerds think about?"
This is the answer.
I can't believe this is still on the front page of the Ning.

Let's all talk about the personal lives of people we don't know and will never meet! Woo! Has anyone heard about Jennifer Aniston and John Mayer? OMG it is so effed up! I bet Angelina Joe Lee steals him away from her too OMG roflcopter lollerskates!
i don't think this is only about celebrities. i thought it was about attitudes to domestic abuse and violence toward women.
The title of the thread is Chris Brown/Rihanna.
I found it pretty self explanatory.
As far as domestic abuse and violence towards women, find someone that's pro domestic abuse and we can have a conversation. Obviously if a woman hits a man and instigates a fight, his actions will be self defense unless the violence is extreme. Unless, of course, you are relying on gender roles, in which case you're living in the past. I've personally seen a case thrown out of court which at first would appear to be domestic abuse but in reality, when gender roles were peeled away, was self defense.
Well, she started it!

You know what? Even if she hit him first, she obviously didn't beat him. This has nothing to do with gender roles.
No, it has to do with the law. One of which being that you can not physically harm another human being. She broke that law and he defended himself. He did however go beyond defending himself and that's where he broke the law. The point is, Chris Brown is not completely to blame for the situation. He's actually a little less to blame, because without the initial contact there would have been no reason for him to defend himself, which points to him not going beyond self-defense and into assault.

The case has nothing to do with gender roles, but the way in which the majority of people see this, including feminist, has quite a bit to do with gender roles.
are you seriously saying that women and men are treated equally. where are all those convicted rapists then.
I'm saying that's what is being strived for, so why take steps back when it affects women in a negative way instead of a positive way?

RSS

© 2013   Created by Hank Green.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service