Tags: constitution, control, gun, guns, rights
Permalink Reply by Latch33570 on March 31, 2012 at 1:50pm If they are unable to use a gun because of disability then for them this is a non issue. Taser and pepperspray isn't enough to hold off an attacker. It just isn't enough. A gun will work just fine.
Permalink Reply by Vertigo_One [Ops Mod] on March 31, 2012 at 1:51pm "It just isn't enough" isn't an argument. A taser will knock someone unconsious. How is that not enough?
Permalink Reply by Latch33570 on April 1, 2012 at 5:35pm tasers don't knock people unconsious they stun them for a few seconds and then not all the time.
You can pull th
e trigger again but the guy might have pulled the lead out. It isn't good enough. (and yes it is an argument) If you need more firepower then you need more. Those aren't enough. You have the right and responsibility to defend yourself and your family with deadly force if necessary.
Permalink Reply by Vertigo_One [Ops Mod] on April 1, 2012 at 7:06pm tasers don't knock people unconsious they stun them for a few seconds and then not all the time.
That's a lower setting. Tasers can and do knock people unconsious.
You can pull the trigger again but the guy might have pulled the lead out. It isn't good enough.
Not an argument. An opinion
Those aren't enough. You have the right and responsibility to defend yourself and your family with deadly force if necessary.
Deadly force, yes, but the equipment to use that deadly force should NOT include a gun
Permalink Reply by Latch33570 on April 2, 2012 at 1:35pm I totally disagree with you. You finally said that deadly force might be needed but why not a gun if deadly force is needed.
Permalink Reply by Vertigo_One [Ops Mod] on April 2, 2012 at 5:13pm Because a gun is too powerful. It puts you in a position to threaten more people .
Permalink Reply by Latch33570 on April 2, 2012 at 6:27pm Which is why it is a good tool to defend yourself and your family.
Permalink Reply by Vertigo_One [Ops Mod] on April 2, 2012 at 6:39pm No, it's not. It gives an individual too much ability. A knife or taser is a fine defense. A gun can too easily become offensive. A gun has too much power to allow for a safe defense.
Permalink Reply by Abreo on April 3, 2012 at 4:36pm So when you defend yourself you ought to use a less effective means of doing so even if that gives your attacker a greater chance of success?
Permalink Reply by Vertigo_One [Ops Mod] on April 4, 2012 at 1:39am The reasoning isn't to do with self defense, it's to do with the safety of everyone at large. If everyone has guns, the world at large becomes more dangerous, not less.
Permalink Reply by Latch33570 on April 5, 2012 at 8:26am Vertigo your OPINION that tasers and knives are good enough is wrong in my OPINION. To me my opinion is worth more than your opinion, to me. I will vote my way and hope we outvote you and yours. I hope you never have to live in a neighborhood where you don't feel safe. I have lived in such a neighborhood. Quite frankly we needed a gun. We had to worry about gangs.
Permalink Reply by Vertigo_One [Ops Mod] on April 5, 2012 at 8:51am Latch, do you not see the ilogcial nature of what you are saying. If no one has guns, no one has reason to feel in danger. Following your logic, every country in the world would have to have a nuclear weapon.
© 2013 Created by Hank Green.
Powered by