Tags: constitution, control, gun, guns, rights
Permalink Reply by Übereil on May 25, 2009 at 9:44am
Permalink Reply by Übereil on May 27, 2009 at 1:18am
Permalink Reply by Übereil on May 27, 2009 at 3:22pm
Permalink Reply by Alix Laya on July 29, 2012 at 12:36am are you gonna keep it under your pillow? and shoot yourself? Greeeeeeeaaaaat. Under the bed?
There is such a thing as a gun safe. There are also gun cases that can be kept under lock and key. My dad easily has over forty guns (most inherited from his great-uncle, who probably had more guns than the city's police force, but that's a different story), and not once has he accidentally shot himself.
Guns have one use. To injure, and to kill (besides sport, which has been covered).
Don't say they only have one use when you just listed three. There's sport. There's self-defense. There is intimidation and violence. With your logic, I could argue that pillows should be made illegal. They only have one use: to suffocate people (besides, you know, being comfortable, which I'm sure doesn't need to be covered).
Permalink Reply by Vertigo_One [Ops Mod] on July 29, 2012 at 6:30am There is such a thing as a gun safe.
But there is no such thing as a safe gun.
My dad easily has over forty guns (most inherited from his great-uncle, who probably had more guns than the city's police force, but that's a different story), and not once has he accidentally shot himself.
Annecdotal evidence isn't good for much. Staticics demonstrate over and over again that if you own a gun you are more likly to use it (intentionally or accidentally) against either yourself or someone close to you, than someone who presents a danger to you.
Don't say they only have one use when you just listed three. There's sport.
Which, as he pointed out, has already been covered. You don't need to own a gun for sport. A club can own it, and it will not be a problem.
There's self-defense.
Which would be made much easier if no one had guns, because then people wouldn't be able to threaten each other.
With your logic, I could argue that pillows should be made illegal. They only have one use: to suffocate people
Okay, let's do a chart here.
Answer me this, why do you need a gun?
You don't need it for self defence. That is what the police is for. And before you say "what if person X has a gun" let me remind you that if you remove them from circulation, less people will have access, making the world less dangerous.
Permalink Reply by Hutch Hogan on July 30, 2012 at 6:05pm Which would be made much easier if no one had guns, because then people wouldn't be able to threaten each other.
Well, depends what you mean. There are other weapons, knives, bear spray, snapping turtles (all have been used for armed robberies).
Then there's also countries like Brazil where gun ownership is low, but gun crime is high. Though my infographic will provide an interesting insight into the debate.
http://nationalpostnews.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/fo0728_worldfir...
Clearly there is more to this debate than simply gun ownership.
Permalink Reply by Vertigo_One [Ops Mod] on July 31, 2012 at 4:10am Yes, there is more, but I think it would be idiotic to deny that gun ownership is a massive factor.
Permalink Reply by Hutch Hogan on July 31, 2012 at 10:01am but I think it would be idiotic to deny that gun ownership is a massive factor.
I deny that it is even in the top 3.
Permalink Reply by Vertigo_One [Ops Mod] on July 31, 2012 at 12:45pm Then explain why there is a broad correlation between percentage of homicdes by firearm and the number of firearms owned per 100 citizens?
Permalink Reply by Hutch Hogan on July 31, 2012 at 12:57pm Because the correlation is littered with outliers and is examining only two variables.
A chart of education quality/accessibility and property crime incidence would add more colours to this picture.
© 2013 Created by Hank Green.
Powered by