This is a place for an intellectual and non-hateful debate over all things religious between those with an open mind. If you are not willing to think about any arguments posted here, leave right now. If you are just going to spam religious people and/or atheists with hate comments, leave right now. This should also have nothing to do with religion being bad or good for the world.
I personally am atheist, I have found no evidence for any God's existence. The Bible and other holy books have been translated and subjected to change many times (this is an undebatable fact). And science proves any literal interpretations worthless and untrustworthy.
Permalink Reply by Willy on January 14, 2011 at 7:38pm
Permalink Reply by Eystein, on January 14, 2011 at 7:34pm
Permalink Reply by Willy on January 14, 2011 at 8:39pm
Permalink Reply by Eystein, on January 14, 2011 at 9:14pm
Permalink Reply by Vertigo_One [Ops Mod] on January 15, 2011 at 3:34am No, they just say it's unlikly and then say "but we can't be absolutely certian" to make their position immune from attack.
No, they fucking do not. You can be reasonably certain that your god exists, can you not? So why the hell can't atheists be reasonably certain that he doesn't?
Also, I'll copy/paste this response of mine since you seem to have ignored it.
In cohesion with Dan's analogy of an invisible, incorporeal dragon, saying "there probably isn't one because I have never seen, smelt, taste, heard, or felt it, and there's no proof of it otherwise" is a logical statement, and the only reason you'd disagree with that is because you know the analogy is being applied to your god.
kthanx
Permalink Reply by Vertigo_One [Ops Mod] on January 16, 2011 at 1:20am No, they fucking do not. You can be reasonably certain that your god exists, can you not? So why the hell can't atheists be reasonably certain that he doesn't?
Because they, unlike me, have absolutely no evidence. I have evidence, although you may not agree with it, but it does exist.
In cohesion with Dan's analogy of an invisible, incorporeal dragon, saying "there probably isn't one because I have never seen, smelt, taste, heard, or felt it, and there's no proof of it otherwise" is a logical statement, and the only reason you'd disagree with that is because you know the analogy is being applied to your god.
Flaw. There is evidence for God's existance. Just because you disagree with said proof, doesn't make it innacurate to say it exists.
Permalink Reply by Fake Crowley on January 16, 2011 at 1:42am Um, in order for something to be, "proof," or, "evidence," I don't think it can be disputable...
Just by definition.
Sorry, just putting that out there. I'm probably wrong.
Permalink Reply by Willy on January 16, 2011 at 1:56am
Permalink Reply by Willy on January 17, 2011 at 3:10pm
© 2013 Created by Hank Green.
Powered by