Although now, I want to leave my home because my mother is a lunatic, when I was a kid & my mother haad no means to earn money I don't think all of her children should have been taken away. It's scientifically proven that it's much better for children to be with there own parents for later mental health.
The reason I called you cranky, grandpa =P, is not because I don't agree with you that having a baby at a young age is incredibly stupid, imo. It is because you seem so incredibly more hellbent on judging and pushing these people away, than you are concerned with the well-being of their more or less "accidental" children.
Why does it matter so much to you?
The private sector donations would go up.
You have yet to prove this, this is a mere optimisitc belief, one not grounded in any kind of reality.
I am so terrible because I think that people should pay their own way and other people should be able to keep what they earned unless it goes to the common good.
The reason you are terrible is because you continue to maintain your beliefs and when people ask you to present evidence to support them, you refuse. You expect us to accept your own experience as all the evidence required that most people on welfare are lazy, despite the fact that there are plenty of other people with experience that contradicts yours. And you expect us to believe that private contributions would cover the gap left by the state if the state withdrew, without any evidence to suggest that is the case.
IF people cant feed em they shouldn t breed em. Especially with todays acess to contraceptives and family planning. Please, they are just irresponsible people at least most of them.
Some people make bad choices, yes. That doesn't mean they should always have to suffer etc.
Vertigo I have provided some evidence on cause of poverty which anyone can look up. The main cause is out of wedlock children. www.heritage.org use their search engine to look up understanding poverty in the US. What do you mean they shouldn t have to "suffer"? They should have to pay. I firmly believe that private donations would take care of the problem. I cant prove it because there are no modern examples that I know of and welfare started in the 30's. Bye the way I am not a terrible person. I am actually a nice guy. By the way what does imo mean?
Eistein It matters because I think that it is wrong to take forcefully from someone who earned something to give to someone who didnt. Because that person acted irresponsibly. It doesn t affect me personally because I no longer pay income taxes.
By the way what does imo mean?
Haha, that used to bug me too xD. It means 'in my opinion'. When in doubt, check out 'urbandictionary.com'.
Why don't you pay income tax?
I must agree with Vertigo on the donation thing. I don't think people would donate measurably more in the long run. Maybe there would be a short boost, but soon people would forget about it and gradually shift toward spending all the money on themselves instead like we usually do.
Again Loxi, I must say hearing what you got to deal with makes me cold sweat. It's horrible. I don't know what to say... :(