You know, even though she didn't say it in exactly these words, Stephanie Steadfast
made a really good point. Instead of all of us only pursuing our own channels (which we should continue doing, I think!), why not do a coordinated effort as well? I mean, it's easy to ignore one or two emails, but what if, say, Ellen DeGeneres or Oprah Winfrey or Perez Hilton or whoever got 50 or 100 or (dare we dream?!) even more emails about this? I'd think they'd almost have to pay attention to it.
(Just as an aside, of the three I mentioned, I personally think Ellen DeGeneres would be our best bet, but I'm not expert on talk shows. She just seems the most willing to do something goofy while also being open to requests from viewers. Everyone else I can think of seems (to me) to fit one of those criteria or the other, but not both. But that's just my perception and I'm totally open to other thoughts on it.)
In order to work properly, I think the effort would have to be a little bit organized. For example, it'd be more noticeable if all the emails used basically the same subject line but just a little different so they'd all be unique. Maybe something like "Helen Hunt question from xxx" where "xxx" is either your real name or your username here, whichever you prefer. On the other hand, it'd be more convincing if everyone writes the request in their own words
inside the email because that makes it clear that it's definitely from a lot of different people, not just one or a few using different addresses. And I think the effect would be strongest if all the emails arrive within the same 24-48 hour period. There's probably other stuff to consider too, but this is what comes to mind immediately.
So could we (and, more importantly,
should we) organize something like this? We could put out requests here, on YouTube, in blogs, to our friends and family that we think might cooperate, etc etc, giving instructions on what to do and when to send it, and then sit back and see what happens. What do you think?