Nerdfighter D&D Team!
Information
okay, my idea is to play Dungeons and Dragons over the internet, probably using a video chat of some sort. We could either have 1 team or we can form multiple teams.
Members: 43
Latest Activity: Apr 20
Discussion Forum
Just a Suggestion... 2 Replies
so there is this site called tinychat that we can form a group on and play with video (if you have a camera) I use it all the time when my friends don't have skype. It works really well. so yeah!…Continue
Started by Shay Bird. Last reply by Desperado (Adam) Mar 28.
DnD online 5 Replies
Skype for the voice (cam isn't needed)Maptools (or other) for the gridThe augur for the rolls on Skype.That is what you need in order to enjoy playing DnD online. I have all of those things, as well…Continue
Started by Claire Clearwater. Last reply by Claire Clearwater Jan 10.
Comment Wall
Comment
-
Comment by Whale on January 18, 2013 at 12:10pm -
Okay. Sure, I'd like to see them.
-
Comment by Ethan M on January 15, 2013 at 2:47pm -
Sorry... Crazy time of year.
@Whale: I personally like Next. It's more RP based. In 4 it can take up to an hour to get through a combat, where in Next you could take that long if that is what your group is into. But, you could also just take the same fight and be done with it in 6 minutes.
Actions are streamlined, and much more open to the DM's discretion. That's where Advantage and Disadvantage come in. Also, expertise dice are nice. And, character creation is more creative in Next than it is in 4.
Also, all the alignments are back.
I have the documents if you'd like to look them over.
-
Comment by Kiwi [Probably Isn't A Mod] on January 13, 2013 at 7:53pm -
That's why I dissapeared actually! Holidays are crazy! :P
And I like the idea of them trying to make something that also appeals to people to who played classic D&D rather than style D&D; but I wish they would have named it something that didn't make it sound like a catchy diet product or something. XD
-
Comment by Whale on January 2, 2013 at 4:22pm
-
I hope everyone has had good holidays. :D
I know only a tad bit about Next. It has some gameplay element about advantage and disadvantage, and the guys at Wizards of the Coast are trying to make it appeal to players of all editions, or something like that. I haven't played any of the playtests.
Ethan, does it seem better than 4.0?
-
Comment by Ethan M on January 1, 2013 at 9:33pm
-
I've played and run 4.0, and am currently playing 3.5 online. I personally like 4 more.
Though, I've been reading the playtest documents for Next (read 5), and really like that set up.
-
Comment by Kiwi [Probably Isn't A Mod] on January 1, 2013 at 12:58am
-
Talk about basic. This book is so empty compared to the 3.5 and earlier editions handbooks. There's like literally 5 classes. e_e
Oh well! I'll be getting the other ones too.
-
Comment by Whale on December 22, 2012 at 1:06am
-
The Essentials books are the latest updated books.
The 4.e books(such as PH1) can probably be okay. As long as we know the basics, I think we'll be fine.
There is one other book in the essentials line, called the "The Rules Compendium" That book focuses on all the rules and gameplay of 4th edition. It may be helpful to learn more about the edition and such.
-
Comment by Ethan M on December 18, 2012 at 8:37pm
-
Are we going to use the errata? I'm not sure if the newer printings of the PHB have been updated.
I have a subscription to dnd insider, so all my stuff is using it.
-
Comment by Shawn O'Malley (TMBG) on December 18, 2012 at 8:28pm -
yes, dragonborn is in there
-
Comment by Whale on December 18, 2012 at 7:20pm
-
Nice. That has all the classic races and classes. The dragonborn race might be in there too.
© 2013 Created by Hank Green.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Nerdfighter D&D Team! to add comments!