Replied Mar. 12, 2008
Started this discussion. Last reply by Megan2.0 Mar. 12, 2008.
Replied Mar. 1, 2008
tzikeh has not received any gifts yet
Posted on March 19, 2008 at 5:00pm — 1 Comment
Started by doctor in Uncategorized 1 minute ago.
Started by doctor in Uncategorized 4 minutes ago.
Started by doctor in Uncategorized 7 minutes ago.
1625 members
227 members
813 members
© 2009 Created by Hank Green on Ning. Create a Ning Network!
Comment Wall (12 comments)
You need to be a member of Nerdfighters to add comments!
Join this Ning Network
Just turned 44. Consider yourself displaced. :D
Here's a link that may explain it better than I can.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_medium_is_the_message
I am not saying that the medium "is (or should be) the measure by which the ideas within it are judged", but rather how it is an important part of how an idea is received and processed. for example an visual/auditory medium like tv or film adds the sense of sight and hearing, that a book cannot. On the converse side because a book does not include these senses the imagination steps in to fill the void and creates it's interpretations. Neither medium is good or bad, just different.
Take elections for example. In the era where newspapers were the main news source the words and occasional picture were paramount. many have said that a man in a wheel chair could never have been president if tv had been present. i dunno about that, but the sound of a candidates voice, their demeanor and persona often seem more important than the content of the message. Tv makes the message as much about how they seem as what they say.
Look at any war waged since the advent of television. The sites and sounds that this medium conveys to us seems to cause a much more acute empathy reaction than simple words do.
And so art expressed in the mediums of tv and film (and theater) also get to use the sensory expressions of site and sound to evoke the story. it helps advance the plot and characterizations. it is imbedded in the message/story. Film in a theater has the aspect of larger than life, tv visits us in the intimacy of our homes, and theater has the feeling and immediacy of live interaction.
I can tell we are both passionate about such things which is why I working to explain my thoughts as well as i can. textual communication is not my best 'medium' for communication, lol. (I'm a live in person kind of communicator XD.) i come from a background of acting, particularly theater, which is my university degree, so such ideas are intensely interesting to me. You're right, there is a prejudice out there toward certain mediums, but the popularity of these mediums speaks to their efficacy, and that is more telling than any prejudice. And the quality of the art forms created and the amazing artists who are attracted to these mediums is for me, also very telling in regards their value.
If I can be so bold i would caution against letting anyone else's prejudice affect your contemplation of the purpose and effect of a medium of any form of communication. Take this medium, textual communication. as I try to convey my thoughts you don't get to see my facial expressions and body language, my inflection, and indeed my accent. These all influence and affect my communication. without them I must struggle to make myself understood to a complete stranger who has no frame of reference for me. textual communication becomes as much as part of my message as the very thoughts they seek to convey for these very reasons, for good and for ill.
take the vlogbrothers. vlogging is the medium that conveys the message of a brothers relationship and which created relationships between each of us to them, and now to each other. If they had simply blogged to each other would we have been as compelled and would we have related to the extent that we have??? I kinda think not. and even when they do blog now, we have the frame of reference that the medium of vlogging created. we feel a sense of empathy and familiarity with them, whether or not that is completely accurate, again I don't know, but the medium of vlogging was/is an essential part of that experience, that message if you will.
well i have rather rattled on haven't i. let me know your thoughts :)
Ya deadwood was quite the saga eh. I wish i had caught more of carnivale. it was hard to get ijnto partway through, but it had the epic feel, as does 'rome'.
must add in Angel though, and soon hoping to add Joss' new show 'dollhouse'. as for other favs...Bones, er (hard to let a show go that you've watched from the beginning), gilmore girls, veronica mars, touching evil, damages, men in trees, lost, reaper, chuck, supernatural,
plus guilty pleasures, kyleXY, 4400, blood ties, dresden files, eli stone, ....don't judge me, lol
i'm sure a non-tv nerd would go O>O but but but, i love watching the craft of good tv. it can be as fulfilling as any book. do you think the hard core book nerds will put out a hit on me for saying that??? *goes to read harry potter to compensate*
as a fellow tv nerd i am wondering what shows you're into?
so, have you had any ideas as to when and where and what? i'd be happy to
p.s lamb?!?!? i loooooove that book so, so so much.
p.p.s i read your lj post and i can help you with your 2/27 request.
-nice to find the Chicagoan Nerdfighters! I was the only one on the map, back in the day, for a long time!
Not only a Graphic Novel Nerdfighter, but one that is a Chicagoan too!
Welcome :)
View All Comments