Oh silly politicians. The day when we no longer need to deal with fools who wish to legislate their personal beliefs; the day in which we may look onwards at capital hill without a mighty ol' facepalm and headesk, seems too be a bit further away yet. If you haven't guessed by this point - keep up slow-poke, do I need to play the magical rant flute? Turn on the news! -, I'm referring to the ongoing thingy-ma-bob in regards to gay marriage. Yes, thingy-ma-bob. What? I does nus englishshs.
~And coincidently, my ability to write ~
~ Apparently ~
Allow me to get the obvious out of the way - in case you haven't also guessed by point -, I'm rather pro-gay marriage. For instance, I came to realize that it's rather odd that people argue that gay-lovers would ruin the sanctity of marriage. Yet at the same time, they're more than pro-divorce. So much for all that sanctity. You're all for big government when it's invading other peoples' bedrooms. But lord and Raptor riding Jesus forbid the same would be forced upon you. Why, that would just be unconstitutional!
Look, I'm not saying that every church should be forced to conduct gay marriages. They're not publicly owned buildings after all - but all 'em tax breaks ought to make things interesting, when DOMA finally gets overturned.. -. But why by the sense of my big toes, do people wish to inflict lesser rights on their fellow Humans'? America, land o' the free I grew up hearing. Oh aye, land o' the free bankers and restricted rights for everyone else, more like. The notion that gay marriage hurts or harms children raised in such environments has been stricken down again and again. The notion that being gay is a choice has been cut to shreds. So why by Jimmy's wee toenails do we still have to have this discussion?
Oh, I'm sure it's making the right wing in America great friends with their extreme kin in lesser educated states. Where being gay can result in punishment or even execution. It's a ruddy joke and it's making the states out to be one of the biggest jokes of our century. Invade a little country here, restrict a little right there; free guns fo' everybody!
Apparently, one of the justices suggested that it was too early 'to rule broadly' in favour of equality. Of course he never said quality, but that's what it comes down to. Lords and gods forbid they stand up for all their people and not select groups. That'd just be unreasonable!
When it comes down to it however. When DOMA is finally passed and but a blip in our history. There will be people who ask why it took so long. What was the issue. With that in mind, how on earth can any oppose the same rights which you yourself are entitled to?
If you agree, leave a comment!
If you disagree, leave a comment!
If you just want to troll, leave a comment!
I apply to nearly everything, so make sure to get typing and interacting.
Share your lovely brain farts, people!
Oh and I almost forgot...